• Home
  • Blog
  • Contact
The Screaming Moderate

Pot, meet Kettle

4/30/2018

0 Comments

 

The White House Correspondents Association (WHCA) annual dinner Saturday night featured a comedian who presented some jokes that were over the line, and personal. The Association’s president has issued a statement distancing the WHCA from the comic’s act. And, the Association now will have a debate on how or if to go forward with the dinner, whose main aim is supposed to be raising money for scholarships.

 Another leftover from the dinner is that people seem to be lining up either on the side of the comedian who they believe was exercising her right to free speech and those who feel the comedian was another reason the press has a liberal bent.

Call me, after a couple of days of ruminating, in the middle somewhere. My thoughts:
  • I did not like the comedian going personal to attack the White House press secretary and those jokes weren’t very funny either.
  • Other jokes were not to my liking either
  • I do think the WHCA needs to review how its annual dinner is conducted, or even if to continue it but remember its aim is to raise money for journalism scholarships
  • The comedian, unwittingly, handed President Trump more ammunition to attack the media, even though the association’s officers neither condoned nor approved the comedian’s script in advance. They just hired her to perform.
  • Was nice of the association to “apologize.” That should stop some of the accusations being made about them but I think it did nothing wrong
  • The media have now been writing or talking about the comedian’s act for about 72 hours. It was a bad act. Six months from now, though, we won’t even remember who performed much as the last 15 or so dinners.

Six months from now we will still know who the President is. If you’ve forgotten, the President is the one who:
  • Called Mexicans rapists and drug dealers
  • Is trying to ban Muslims and refugees from entering the country
  • Is trying to raise the rent of the country’s poorest people by one-third
  • Criticized a TV host saying she had “blood coming out of her whatever”
  • Equated white supremacists who among other things, chanted “Jews will not replace us”, with "good people."
  • Uttered many personal insults (Lyin’ Jim Comey, Low Energy Jeb, Crooked Hillary,  Leakin’ James Comey, Sneaky Dianne Feinstein, Cheatin’ Obama, Pocahontas Elizabeth Warren,  Mr. Magoo Jeff Sessions, Rocket Man Kim Jung Un) and other misogynistic and racist things.
The President has yet to, and never will, apologize for any of those utterances nor for announcing in very Joe McCarthy-like terms Saturday night that he has dirt on Montana Sen. James Tester and if he used it, the senator would lose his election. What is that information? Likely never to be known. He also will never apologize for the more than 2,000 lies he’s told while in office.

But a comedian goes over the line and THAT’s what we’re talking about?

The WHCA did Sunday distance itself from the comedian’s comments. For me, they didn’t have to. They didn’t approve her jokes or endorse them. They did hire her and that may have turned out to be wrong … but the dinner is, after all, about holding the First Amendment near and dear. In fact, the association’s president, prior to the comedian’s act, gave a very moving and personal speech about her family’s journey and love for American values and dedication to the First Amendment. I have yet to see her speech reported on at any length.

But, believe me, Trump and his Chorus will make sure we are talking about the comedian often including during this fall’s election as he continues to attack the press as the “enemy of the people” or “fake news” or point them out to his rally audiences so they can jeer, growl and then threaten them. All of it, diminishing a most important institution in this country – a free press that keeps politicians honest.

Now, I want to be clear. I despise people who criticize Trump and the Trump people respond with, but Hillary is so crooked, or criticize the Democrats in Congress for slowing the process and the D’s retort is, so did the Republicans.

In this case, however, I do find it appalling that the President who has said such ugly things about so many people feels he has the pulpit from which to judge others on the same issue.


0 Comments

Trump Administration lowering the media's reputation

4/26/2018

0 Comments

 
White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee-Sanders during her briefing the other day when asked about a drop in the ranking of America as a free press nation, said that her standing there taking questions was an example of the Trump Administration’s respect and commitment to a free press.

No, it’s not.

What Sanders does in her briefings is find new ways to avoid any legitimate question the media asks. Same as colleague Kellyanne Conway and her boss, the President of the United States.

President Trump has called the media the “enemy of the people.” Not true, of course. But it is true that that trio of Trump-Sanders-Conway is the enemy of truth and transparency.

In the old days of the White House press operation (not that long ago) the press secretary briefed for as long as an hour sometimes more, taking questions until  the media had no more. Today, the briefing typically runs (from my watching them on TV) from 30 minutes to three hours late and lasts one-half hour at best. And, the briefing is ended by Sanders not a member of the press as had been the tradition.

You might think these are minor points – but they are not. This means she can cut off any discussion at any time she chooses, stopping the media from continuing to pursue a topic, not providing transparency or a willingness to answer questions even when the reporters have more.

The Washington Post reported: “The watchdog organization Reporters Without Borders on Wednesday released its annual World Press Freedom Index, which ranks 180 countries from highest to lowest levels of press freedom. The United States fell in the ranking, as it did last year — this time, two places down to 45th. Norway remained on top, with North Korea as its polar opposite.”

The Secretary General of Reporters without Borders in the report says: “Political leaders who fuel loathing for reporters bear heavy responsibility because they undermine the concept of public debate based on facts instead of propaganda. To dispute the legitimacy of journalism today is to play with extremely dangers political fire.”

Where does one begin to recount the times this President and his Administration have said things like “fake news” or avoided a question or flat-out lied about something? In just the last few days there are a few examples:
  1. Sanders’ unbelievably ridiculous statement that an example of the Administration’s support for the free press is her standing there answering their questions at that moment. But, go back and see what her answers were in that briefing. Overall, they were dodges, weaves and misrepresentations of a real answer
  2. Just this morning, President Trump returned to his favored way of campaigning in 2016 by calling into the Trump News Network, better known as Fox News, for an interview with Fox’ morning hosts who should be on the White House payroll the way they pander to this White House often saying things on their show that Trump finds so compelling that he will repeat later in the day as if  they were his own thoughts.
  3. White House Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway was on CNN the other day being interviewed by Dana Bash. After avoiding most of Bash’s questions, the reporter next asked Conway about her husband’s Tweets criticizing this President. Conway went into faux anger phase accusing Bash of asking a sexist question and talking over her to continue making her not-true point. Bash, as is her demeanor and being, handled it professionally, not raising her voice or showing any anger herself. Conway should never be accepted as guest for an interview. She has never (in my view) spoken the truth and nearly always winds up attacking the interviewer as a way of getting off the topic and into something the President’s base will like.
  4. The other day at an Oval Office photo opp/media opportunity, an ABC reporter asked Trump if he was considering a pardon for Trump lawyer Michael Cohen who is under investigation. Trump, with the French president sitting next to him, looked at the reporter and dismissed the him by responding “stupid question.” (It was a legitimate question).
 
Those few examples come after a campaign’s worth and more than a year of the Trump presidency where he attacks the media, points to them during speeches to call them “fake” and to energize his audience. Some day one of those reporters will be attacked because of the President’s name-calling. In fact, at least one had to be escorted by law enforcement out of a Trump rally  to be sure she was protected from the audience.
 
This is not a small thing, as evidenced by the Reporters Without Border study. This President has made it a major goal to destroy the media because it helps him feed his base the raw meat they love.
 
According to the Washington Post in 2017 the President used the term “fake news” more than 153 times. He uses the term to describe coverage he views as unfair to him or on a topic he’d rather the public not know about.
 
A Politico survey found that no foreign leader – even the worst in the world – used the term “fake news” before 2017. A year later, that is not true. A sampling:

  • In Libya, officials there quoted a Trump Tweet that called CNN fake news to discredit a story the cable network ran about migrants being sold into slavery.
 
  • Singapore, known for its already tight control of the news, introduced legislation that would allow government the power to force articles they deem to be “fake news” to be removed.
 
  • Burma. The UN Human Rights Commission estimates that more than a half million Rohingya have fled the country because of systematic military attacks. Asked about this, a Burmese government official said: “There are no such thing as Rohingya. It’s fake news.”
 
  • Syria. President Bashar al-Assad, who kills his own people including babies with nerve gas, was presented by Amnesty International with a report alleging serious human rights abuses at one of Syria’s prisons. Assad responded by saying not only was the news organization asking him (Yahoo News) unreliable but added, “as you know, we’re in a fake news era.”
 
So, the leader of Syria, a country Trump has bombed twice for its use of nerve gas, is quoting the U.S. president to cover for his atrocities.
 
I remember when U.S. presidents were quoted using lofty language about the freedoms of a democracy and how this country of migrants has led the way.
 
The good news is the media, especially outlets like The New York Times, Washington Post, Boston Globe, CNN and others have been doing some of their best reportorial work in years, going after stories they can’t get from government spokesmen. The bad news is we have a President who is doing his best to kill yet another American institution – the media solely to make himself look good.
0 Comments

'I always tell the truth. Even when I lie' -- Al Pacino

4/17/2018

0 Comments

 
Voters have assumed for decades that if there is one thing they can count on from their politicians – it is that they will lie.

Not entirely true though I get why they think that, especially these days.

Our society has taken a turn, for the worse, thanks to the man who resides in the Oval Office. Reality today is:
  •  Based on records kept by the Washington Post, President Trump has lied an average of six times a day.
  • We have a White House press secretary who lies probably more often than that
  • We have Cabinet members who say one thing one day and are contradicted by the White House the next. And not on minor things. Recent example: UN Ambassador Nikki Haley said Sunday the U.S. would be slapping additional sanctions on Russia and the next day the White House takes it back. That’s not really a lie but you get my point.
  • We have a former FBI Director – James Comey – who has a reputation for truth, justice and the American way, who has descended to Trump’s level by ragging on the President in his new memoir for the color of his skin and his small hands (in addition to far more serious allegations). For the record, I believe Comey over Trump.
  • We have a lawyer to the President of the United States who has threatened and bullied to cover the President’s behind for years and who tried to hide the identity of a client because that client was, lo and behold, Fox News’ host Sean Hannity, who asked that his identify be kept from the public
  • Speaking of Hannity, one of the country’s most watched TV hosts, he lies on his show nightly, mostly in defense of Trump. And, is probably parsing his words quite carefully in why Michael Cohen, his and the President’s lawyer, listed him in court, before a judge, as a client
  • Bit players in the recent dramedy are porn stars, Playboy playmates, Russian oligarchs, Putin, and more.
What a world we now live in!

Overall, we are not dealing with the classiest of people. One of Trump’s surrogates on CNN the other day said Americans don’t elect presidents, or at least this president, because they want his moral leadership.  I think most of us would disagree with that. It may not be the primary reason, but it’s high on the list.

As we get further into the legal handling of Trump’s personal attorney, Cohen’s history of “fixing” things for Trump, will only get worse. If he negotiated a payment to buy Stormy Daniels’ silence on her alleged affair with Trump, and another more than $1 million settlement on behalf of a now-former Republican National Committee finance chairman for impregnating a Playboy model during his affair with her, common sense tells us there is more wretched stuff to be found on Cohen’s underbelly.

Trump’s angry and obsessive reaction to the raids on Cohen’s office and home and securing of his electronic devise are a tell on that. Just as (today being Tax Day) his refusal to release his taxes is a tell on his finances.

0 Comments

The tip of the Trump iceberg?

4/10/2018

0 Comments

 
The raid on President Trump’s “fixer” yesterday may be the thread that unravels lots of troubling issues for the President.

I’m not a lawyer but the raid on Attorney Michael Cohen’s office by the U.S. Attorney of New York likely will produce more about the President’s personal dealings and cover-ups than Special Counsel Robert Mueller ever could or was assigned to take on. This newest investigation is not about the election but about whether Cohen broke any laws with, primarily, the payoff(s) he’s made on private citizen Trump’s behalf. Trump can yell “witch hunt” all he wants but by handing off the case to the U.S. attorney, the raid on Cohen’s office isn’t about possible Russian collusion with the Trump campaign at all.

And while the President yells about biased Democrats who are investigating him on the Mueller team, the raid yesterday was signed off by the highest officials in the Department of Justice – all of whom Trump appointed.

From what I can understand, Mueller’s investigators came across some questionable financial transfer(s) by Cohen, some of which were pointed out by bank(s) before the election (proof: Cohen’s payoff of $130,000 Stormy Daniels preceded the election by about two dozen days). This may be the main focus for the U.S. Attorney but it also leads to exposing many of Cohen’s files over many years.

This is not about Russian collusion, but this may be the way to uncovering a lot of things about Trump that he himself promised to reveal (his taxes for one thing) but never has.

Cohen reportedly has been at the center of everything Trump for many years. He was the one trying to broker a deal for Trump Tower Moscow, for example. The fact that he paid off Daniels for her alleged one night only affair with Trump shows he also has been in the middle of other such matters for the President. He is the President’s attorney and has been for years. Raiding his home and offices is akin to a raid on his daughter’s home. Cohen is family.

Mueller did the right thing suggesting the case be transferred to the U.S. Attorney since it didn’t fit his investigative mandate of Russia meddling with our election. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein did the right thing in deciding to hand it off to the U.S. Attorney and the U.S. Attorney, while heavy handed according to legal experts, did the right thing by conducting the surprise raid because there was a likelihood that Cohen might destroy potential evidence.

Trump did the wrong thing for the rule of law by crossing his arms (one of his physical tells) and ranting about Sessions, Rosenstein and Mueller, but if he thinks firing any of them over this is the right thing to do, he’s wrong.


0 Comments

I call BS on the White House Correspondents Association

4/6/2018

0 Comments

 
             The White House announced today that President Trump will not attend the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner April 28 and that he will send his press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, in his place. Trump also turned down an invitation to last year’s dinner.

            As Marjory Stoneman Douglas’ Emma Gonzalez said, I call BS.

            Donald Trump has called the media the “enemy of the people.” He constantly calls the press “fake news.” He has said that so often that there is a good chunk of this country that believes that the mainstream media make up stories out of whole cloth. And, there is a good chunk of authoritarian leaders of other countries who not only are using the term “fake news,” they are taking actions against the media. Trump's approach to the "lying" media has given those leaders the opening to jail or hurt reporters. Trump has threatened that here.

            And, Ms. Sanders lies daily to the media on behalf of her boss. I call BS on that too.

           The only “fake news” coming out of this Administration is when its appointees open their mouths.

            The Correspondents’ Association should not have invited Trump to its dinner. And it should not accept Sanders as a White House representative. I never thought I’d say that neither the President of the United States nor his press secretary should attend this dinner. It had been one of the highlights of the year when I worked in DC. And that’s before having Fawn Hall as a guest opened the doors to A-list celebrities taking the spots normally used by a real reporter. Those A-listers won’t be there this year because they do not support in any way this President.

            The dinner once was an event where reporters could invite those they cover, hear a comedian tell jokes about everyone, hear the President make self-deprecating remarks and have nice dinner and drinks. This President wouldn’t know a self-deprecating remark if he said it himself.

            When you have a President and his chief spokesman lying daily. When you have Cabinet members like the Environmental Protection Agency’s Administrator Scott Pruitt and others lying about spending money on big raises for their staffs, or defending first-class travel on the taxpayers’ dime or chartering a jet for a one-hour trip that cost $25,000 well, to quote Emma again, I call BS.

            The association should not have invited Trump to its dinner. Let's not pretend this is about good will. It isn't. Trump doesn't respect good will. He respects strength. I know, respect the office – and I do. But I do not respect Donald Trump nor do I respect his spokesman who lies from that podium every time she stands behind it. I wouldn’t invite her either – and to hell with trying to establish good relations with a White House that only wants good relations if you compliment the President daily, worship the ground he walks on, and, in effect, bow down to the Emperor who, thank goodness, is wearing clothes.

            I call BS.


0 Comments

Conflicts of interest can be interesting

4/3/2018

0 Comments

 
Corruption in politics doesn’t always mean you’re lining your own pockets. Then again, we have no idea who if anyone, is getting wealthier off the Trump White House, at least no idea of who in the Administration may be because Trump hasn’t released his taxes, despite promising to.

In many ways, the facts speak for themselves, though. We have seen where this President easily takes after any real or perceived enemies he faces with a no-holds barred approach.

  • Most recently, the President is on the attack against Jeff Bezos, who owns Amazon and, separately, The Washington Post, whose reporting on this Administration has brought back that paper’s most glorious news-breaking days. In the last week Trump has, clearly intentionally, reduced the value of the company via his comments that affect the stock market and clearly is inciting his followers with his allegations of “fake” news against the Post. That’s one example of his viciousness against his “enemies” that also carries financial consequences for his target. By the way, you'd be hard-pressed to find among Trump's predecessors a President who didn't watch his tongue for fear of affecting the markets.
  • Take a look at Sinclair Broadcasting’s recent effort at putting its real fake news on its member stations newscasts by sending a script it ordered its news anchors to read. That script attacked fake news, clearly doing the bidding of this President. By the way, Sinclair owns 173 stations around the country. And, the company is awaiting federal approval (read that approval from Trump’s Justice Department) on a deal that would allow Sinclair to pay $3.9 billion for a buyout of Tribune Media, which would add 42 stations to Sinclair’s holdings. That’s about 70 percent of all the country’s TV households. In anti-trust terms, that’s a lot. Everyone knows the quickest route to Trump’s heart, and approval, is showering him with compliments or taking up his side in a fight.
  • Then you have Louise Linton, wife of Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin. Ms Linton is an actress. At the moment she reportedly is working on new scenes for a movie she made five or six years ago but was never released. Now, with the notoriety she has earned as Mnuchin’s wife and her high-living style which has attracted major attention in DC and elsewhere, she is working on those updates, which are being funded by an unidentified investor. By the way, her husband is known, before his Treasury days as a movie investor. I can add one and one, boys and girls, can you?
  • And, of course, there’s Trump’s style of accepting credit for good things and running away from the bad. Examples? The “kids” that benefited from DACA which allowed them to stay in this country if brought in as juveniles by their parents. The Congress has yet to pass a fix for that. The need for a fix came about because President Obama issued an executive order that protected the 700,000 covered by DACA. Trump, when he took office, rescinded that executive order which meant those 700,000 would be deported. He eventually professed his “love” for those 700,000 and promised to work out a fix so they could remain here. Democrats at one point even agreed to fund his silly border wall with Mexico (yes, that one Trump promised Mexico would pay for) in return for protecting the DACA people. Trump walked away from that deal, which it seemed to me, he was the beneficiary of, and now blames the Democrats, who hold a strong minority in each house of Congress, for not passing a fix. I’m inclined to react by saying WTF? But I’m still trying to figure out how Trump thinks he gets away with his blame statements when he’s to blame.
  • How about the stock market? Last year when the market kept hitting all-time highs Trump was pumping his chest taking credit for the incredibly constant rise. This year, with the market backing down, he is silent. By the way, a fact as reported by CNBC's John Harwood: "Rise in Dow Jones Industrial Average from presidential inauguration to first market day of April the following year: -Obama: 37%, -Trump: 19%"
  • Then, there are Trump’s Cabinet choices who range from Education Secretary Betsy DeVoss’ inability to put two coherent thoughts together in a “60 Minutes” interview (not to mention that she admitted not visting at-risk schools) to Housing Secretary Ben Carson ordering a $31,000 dining room set for his office and, when caught, blamed his wife for the decision. Then there’s EPA head Scott Pruitt who flies first-est class everywhere because, he says, he needs the protection of that first-class blue curtain to keep away the riff-raff who threaten him. Apparently because those bodyguards who travel with him can’t be trusted to keep a flaming tree-hugger away from their protectee. Oh, and there’s that sweetheart $50 a night deal he has for a Capitol Hill room in a swanky condo building. Yes, that condo that’s owned by someone who lobbies the EPA. But, of course that lobbyist would never expect any repayment in kind from the EPA director, now would she? Hmmmm.  These “titans of industry” who Trump has named to his Cabinet, including more than a few billionaires, I guess have never heard the phrase “avoid even the appearance of conflict of interest” while in office. They can’t identify an appearance or a conflict because they never had to before. Is that a defense against the small “c” crimes they commit against the taxpayer every day?

But I fear I’m out of space. So, can’t get into things like, can there possibly be insider trading going on when the President rips an American publicly traded company to drive their share price down? Hmmm…could there be? That, Mr. President, is just a “fact” that “some” people are spreading, much like your Tweet this morning which accused CNN of only hiring anti-Trump reporters.

Oh, and remember Trump taking credit for that “every day another record high for the stock market” phenomenon last year? Trump believes that if you’re President while such things happen, you deserve the credit. Of course, last year he accomplished little policy wise so I’m not sure what he thought he did to boost the markets other than just his marvelous existence.

This year, the market so far is another story, gyrating because of his professed desire to start a trade war because “they’ are so easy to win,” he says, and by attacking publicly traded American companies as they lose billions on paper value a day.

Oh, and there is also his being out-charmed internationally by, get this, not only Vladimir Putin but by that personality challenged Kim Jong-Un, the dictator of North Korea. Read that sentence again: The President of the United States demonstrates far less charm internationally than Vladimir Putin OR Kim Jong-un, two men who kill their own citizens and control the ballot box so no free election can be held.

Trump invited Putin to a summit in the White House – that KGB murderer/attacker of U.S. elections invited to meet IN the White House by the President of the United States. Wait, he may offer him a night in the Lincoln Bedroom or, more likely, give him a tour of the Situation Room! Wouldn’t that be a grand way to demonstrate how well he can get along with Putin?

But that’s another story.
0 Comments

    RSS Feed

     
    Follow @bjaycooper

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013

    B. Jay Cooper

    B. Jay is a former deputy White House press secretary to Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush. He also headed the communications offices at the Republican National Committee, U.S. Department of Commerce, and Yale University. He is a former reporter and is the retired deputy managing director of APCO Worldwide's Washington, D.C., office.
    He is the father of three daughters and grandfather of five boys and one girl. He lives in Marion, Mass.

powered by bjaycooper.com